Las metas de ejecuciónsu inexistencia en los estudiantes de Conservatorio

  1. Navas, Leandro
  2. Marco Rico, Victoria
  3. Holgado Tello, Francisco Pablo
Revista:
Revista de investigación en educación

ISSN: 1697-5200 2172-3427

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 10

Número: 1

Páginas: 172-179

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de investigación en educación

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio es conocer las metas académicas de los estudiantes y comprobar si ellos generaban metas de ejecución de manera espontánea (Brophy, 2005). Participaron 209 estudiantes del Conservatorio Profesional de Música de Alicante (España), el 55,5% eran chicos y el resto chicas, con una edad media de 17,25 años, quienes respondieron a una cuestión de respuesta abierta. Las respuestas fueron sometidas a un análisis cualitativo. Los resultados indicaron que: 1) cuando se les pide a los estudiantes describir sus metas con sus propias palabras, no suelen aludir a metas de ejecución espontáneamente, y 2) las metas de dominio o aprendizaje, junto a las metas de logro, se revelan como las mayoritarias en este grupo de alumnos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms, Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Education Psychology, 84, 261-271.
  • Anderson, L., Brubaker, N., Alleman-Brooks, J. y Duffy, G. (1985). A qualitative study of seatwork in first-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 86, 123-140.
  • Atkinson, J. (1957). Motivational determinants of risktaking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359372.
  • Bartels, J.M., Magun-Jackson, S. y Kemp, A.D. (2009). La regulación volicional y la autorregulación del aprendizaje: un estudio de las diferencias individuales en la motivación de logro aproximación-evitación. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 18, 7 (2), 605-626.
  • Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Brophy, J. (2005). Goal Theorists Should Move on From Performance Goals. Journal of Educational Psychologist, 40 (3), 167-176.
  • Covington M. V. y Roberts, B. (1994). Self-worth and college achievement: Motivational and personality correlates. En P.R. Pintrich, D.R. Brown y C.E. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie (pp. 157-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dweck, C.S. y Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95 (2), 256-273.
  • Elliot, A. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. En M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 243-279). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
  • Elliot, A. y Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
  • Elliot, A. y McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
  • Elliot, A. y Thrash, T. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality : Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804-818.
  • Gonida, E. N., Voulala, K. y Kiosseoglou, G. (2009). Students’ achievement goal orientations and their behavioral and emotional engagement: Coexamining the role of perceived school goal structures and parent goals during adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 53-60.
  • González, A. (2008). Las metas y el futuro: Su importancia para la motivación académica. Revista de psicología general y aplicada, 61 (3), 285-299.
  • González, C., Torregrosa, G. y Navas, L. (2002). Un análisis de las metas en situación de aprendizaje para el alumnado de Primaria y Secundaria Obligatoria. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 13 (1), 69-87.
  • Grant, H. y Dweck, C. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
  • Harackiewicz, J., Barron, K. y Elliot, A. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1-21.
  • Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300 312.
  • Hayamizu, T. y Weiner, B. (1991). A test of Dweck’s model of achievement goals are related to percepctions of ability. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 226-234.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
  • Lemos, M. (1996). Students’ and teachers’ goals in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 151-171.
  • Maehr, M. L. y Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A schoolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3/4), 399-427.
  • McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A. y Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. Nueva York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Middleton, M. J. y Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: an underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (4), 710-718.
  • Midgley, C., Anderman, E. y Urdan, T.C. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122.
  • Navas, L., Soriano, J. A., Holgado, F. P. y López, M. (2009). Las orientaciones de meta de los estudiantes y los deportistas: perfiles motivacionales. Acción Psicológica, 6 (2), 17-29.
  • Nicholls, J. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experiences, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
  • Phan, H.P. (2008). Metas de logro, el entorno del aula, y el pensamiento reflexivo: Un marco conceptual. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 16, 6 (3), 571-602.
  • Pintrich, P. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
  • Pintrich, P. (2000b). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
  • Pintrich, P. (2000c). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
  • Pintrich, P. R. y De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
  • Pintrich, P.R. y Schunk, D.H. (1996). Motivation in education. Theory, research and applications. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Senko, K. y Harackiewicz, J. (2004). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  • Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71-81.
  • Urdan, T. (2001). Contextual influencies on motivation and performance: An examination of achievement goal structures. En F. Salili, C. Chiu, y Y. Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The cultures and context of learning (pp. 171-201). Nueva York: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Urdan, T., Kneisel, L. y Mason, V. (1999). Interpreting messages about motivation in the classroom: Examining the effects of achievement goal structures. In T. Urdan (Ed.), The role of context (pp. 123-158). Stamford, CT: JAI.
  • Valle, A., G. Cabanach, R., González-Pienda, J., Núñez, J., Rodríguez, S. y Rosario, P. (2009). Metas académicas: Perspectiva Histórica y Conceptual e Implicaciones Educativas. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 19, 7 (3), 1.073-1.106.