Aprendizaje basado en problemas en Biología CeLularuna forma de explorar la ciencia.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Allen, D. 2011. Recent research in science teaching and learning. CBE Life Sciences
• Education, (10):8-10.
• Recent research in science teaching and learning. CBE Life Sciences
• Education, (10):132-134.
• Recent research in science teaching and learning. CBE Life Sciences
• Education, (10):334-337.
• Allen, D. y Tanner, K. 2002. Approaches in Cell Biology teaching. Cell Biology Education,
• (1):3-5.
• Approaches to Cell Biology teaching: learning content in contex-problem-based learning. Cell Biology Education, (2):73-81. Chamany K., Allen, D. y Tanner, K. 2008. Making biology learning relevant to students: integrating people, history, and context into college biology teaching. CBE Life Sciences
• Education, (3):267–278.
• DiCarlo, S.E. 2006. Cell biology should be taught as science is practiced. Nature Reviews
• Molecular Cell Biology, (7): 290-296.
• Alberts, B. 1998. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation
• of molecular biologists. Cell, (92): 291-294.
• Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., y Walter, P. 2008. Biología molecular de la célula, Barcelona: ed. Omega, 5a edición.
• Alberts, B. 2009. Making a science of education. Science, (323):15.
• Coil, D., Wenderoth, M.P., CUNNINGHAM, M. y DIRKS, C. 2010. Teaching the process of
• science: faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE Life Sciences Education,
• (9):524-535
• Fischer, C.N. 2011. Changing the Science Education Paradigm: From teaching Facts to
• Engaging the Intellect. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, (84):247-251.
• Fernández, A. 2006. Metodologías activas para la formación de competencias. Educatio
• Siglo XXI, (24):35-56.
• Fiechtner, S.B. y Davis, E.A. 1992. Why some groups fail? A survey of students’ experiences
• with learning groups. In: Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. A.
• S. Goodsell, M. R. Maher, and V. Tinto, Eds. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching,
• Learning, and Assessment. University Park, PA: Syracuse University.
• García, M.S., Jiménez, C. Fonfría, J., Fernández, J. y Torralba, B. 2002. Evolución de
• conceptos relacionados con la estructura y función de membranas celulares en alumnos
• de Enseñanza Secundaria y Universidad. Anales de Biología, (24):201-207.
• Johnson, D., Johnson, R. y Smith, K. 1991. Cooperative Learning: Increasing College
• Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education, Washington: The George
• Washington University.
• Johnson, D.W. y Johnson, R.T. 1994. Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive,
• and Individualistic Learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• __________________________. 1995. Creative Controversy: Intellectual Challenge in the Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., y Smith, K.A. 1998. Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom (2nd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co. Kerr J.F., Wyllie A.H. and Currie .R. 1972. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Cancer, (26): 239–247.
• Villalustre, L. y del Moral, E. 2010. E-portafolios y rúbricas de evaluación en ruralnet, Pixel-
• Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (37):93–105.
• Wood, W.B. 2009. Innovations in Teaching Undergraduate Biology and Why We Need Them.
• Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, (25):93-112.
• Wright, R. y Boggs, J. 2002. Learning Cell Biology as a team: a project-based approach to
• upper-division cell biology. Cell Biology Education, (1):145-153.