Enriching the Integration of Semantic Resources based on WordNet

  1. Gutiérrez Vázquez, Yoan
  2. Fernández Orquín, Antonio
  3. Montoyo Guijarro, Andrés
  4. Vázquez Pérez, Sonia
Revista:
Procesamiento del lenguaje natural

ISSN: 1135-5948

Año de publicación: 2011

Número: 47

Páginas: 249-257

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Otras publicaciones en: Procesamiento del lenguaje natural

Resumen

In this paper we present the enrichment of the Integration of Semantic Resources based in WordNet (ISR-WN Enriched). This new proposal improves the previous one where several semantic resources such as SUMO, WordNet Domains and WordNet Affects were related, adding other semantic resources such as Semantic Classes and SentiWordNet. Firstly, the paper describes the architecture of this proposal explaining the particularities of each integrated resource. After that, we analyze some problems related to the mappings of different versions and how we solve them. Moreover, we show the advantages that this kind of tool can provide to different applications of Natural Language Processing. Related to that question, we can demonstrate that the integration of semantic resources allows acquiring a multidimensional vision in the analysis of natural language.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Atserias, J., L. Villarejo, G. Rigau, E. Agirre, J. Carroll, B. Magnini and P. Vossen. 2004. The MEANING Multilingual Central Repository. In Proceedings of the Second International Global WordNet Conference (GWC’04). Brno, Czech Republic. ISBN 80-210-3302-9.
  • Cotton, S., P. Edmonds, A. Kilgarriff and M. Palmer. 2001. English All word. In SENSEVAL-2: Second International Workshop on Evaluating Word Sense Disambiguation Systems, Association for Computational Linguistics. Toulouse, France.
  • Dorr, B. J. and M. A. M. A. I. Castellón. 1997. Spanish EuroWordNet and LCS-Based Interlingual MT. In AMTA/SIG-IL F irst Workshop on Interlinguas. San Diego, CA.
  • Esuli, A. and F. Sebastiani. 2006. SentiWordNet: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining. In Fifth international conference on Languaje Resources and Evaluation pages 417-422
  • Fellbaum, C. 1998. WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database . University of Cambridge. The MIT Press.
  • Fillmore, C. J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech. pages 20–32, New York.
  • Gliozzo, A., C. Strapparava and I. Dagan. 2004. Unsupervised and Supervised Exploitation of Semantic Domains in Lexical Disambiguation. In Computer Speech and Language .
  • Gutiérrez, Y., A. Fernández, A. Montoyo and S. Vázquez. 2010a. Integration of semantic resources based on WordNet. In XXVI Congreso de la Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural , SEPLN 2010. pages 161-168, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia.
  • Gutiérrez, Y., A. Fernández, A. Montoyo and S. Vázquez. 2010b. UMCC-DLSI: Integrative resource for disambiguation task. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Association for Computational Linguistics. pages 427-432, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Gutiérrez, Y., S. Vázquez and A. Montoyo. 2011a. Sentiment Classification Using Semantic Features Extracted from WordNetbased Resources. In 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis (WASSA 2.011). Association for Computational Linguistics. pages 139-145. Portland, Oregon.
  • Gutiérrez, Y., S. Vázquez and A. Montoyo. 2011b. Word Sense Disambiguation: a graph-based approach using N-Cliques Partitioning Technique. In NLDB'11. pages 112-124 Alicante, Spain.
  • Izquierdo, R., A. Suárez and G. Rigau. 2007. A Proposal of Automatic Selection of Coarsegrained Semantic Classes for WSD,Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, pages 189-196.
  • Magnini, B. and G. Cavaglia. 2000. Integrating Subject Field Codes into WordNet. In Proceedings of Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2000). pages 1413-1418.
  • Magnini, B., C. Satrapparava, G. Pezzulo and A. Gliozzo. July 2002. The Role of Domains Informations in Word Sense Disambiguatios. Treto. Cambridge University Press.
  • Magnini, B., C. Strapparava, G. Pezzulo and A. Gliozzo. 2002. Comparing Ontology-Based and Corpus-Based Domain Annotations in WordNet. In Proceedings of the F irst International WordNet Conference . pages 21-25 Mysore, India.
  • Miller, G. A. 1995. WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Comunications of the ACM. Vol 38. pages 39-41.
  • Niles, I. 2001. Mapping WordNet to the SUMO Ontology,Teknowledge Corporation.
  • Niles, I. and A. Pease. 2003. Linking Lexicons and Ontologies: Mapping WordNet to the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology.
  • Niles, I. and A. Pease. 2001. Origins of the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology. In Working Notes of the IJCAI-2001 Workshop on the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology. Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Pianta, E., L. Bentivogli and C. Girardi. 2002. MultiWordNet. Developing an aligned multilingual database. In Proceedings of the 1st International WordNet Conference . pages 293-302, Mysore, India.
  • Ševčenko, M. 2003. Online Presentation of an Upper Ontology. CTU Prague, Dept of Computer Science. SUO. 2001. The IEEE Standard Upper Ontology web site. Available in: http://suo.ieee.org.
  • Valitutti, A., C. Strapparava and O. Stock, Eds. 2004. Developing Affective Lexical ResourcesITC-irst, Trento, Italy, PsychNology Journal.
  • Vázquez, S., A. Montoyo and G. Rigau. 2004. Using Relevant Domains Resource for Word Sense Disambiguation. In IC-I’04. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence . pages, Ed: CSREA Press. Las Vegas, E.E.U.U. WordNet Domain. 2009. FBK-irst The Human Language Technology Research Unit at FBK. Available in: http://wndomains.fbk.eu/.
  • Zubaryeva, O. and J. Savoy. 2010. Opinion Detection by Combining Machine Learning & Linguistic Tools In Proceedings of NTCIR-8 Workshop Meeting. pages 221-227, Tokyo, Japan.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet