Factors influencing the choice of a university degree: the case of recreation, parks and tourism administration studies

  1. Iglesias Martínez, Marcos J.
  2. Martínez Ruiz, María Ángeles
  3. Tortosa Martínez, Juan
Revista:
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise: JHSE

ISSN: 1988-5202

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 7

Número: 3

Páginas: 684-697

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4100/JHSE.2012.73.08 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise: JHSE

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

El objetivo de esta investigación es analizar las expectativas de los estudiantes que tienen una influencia en la elección de Ocio y Tiempo Libre como una especialización académica. De acuerdo con el análisis de la investigación sobre los motivos de la elección de Recreación, Parques y estudios de Administración de Turismo en una universidad en los Estados Unidos, las conclusiones alcanzadas muestran que entre los múltiples factores, las expectativas de tener experiencias de aprendizaje colaborativo y situado es uno de los principales razones para elegir estos estudios, así como las oportunidades de trabajo que ofrece este grado. Los resultados de esta investigación evidencia el alto grado de emotividad que afecta esta decisión. Las conclusiones de este estudio pueden ser útiles para el diseño de los planes de estudios de ocio y recreo.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ANDERSON JR, GREENO JG, REDER LM, SIMON HA. Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher. 2000; 229(4):11-13.
  • BROOKES M. Evaluating the 'Student Experience': An Approach to Managing and Enhancing Quality in Higher Education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education. 2003; 2(1):17-26.
  • BROWN JS, COLLINS A, DUGUID P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher. 1989; 18(1):32-42.
  • COCHRAN-SMITH M, LYTLE SL. Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad and P.D. Pearson, Review of Research in Education. 1999; 24:249-306.
  • COCHRAN-SMITH M, LYTLE SL. Changing Perspectives on Practitioner Research. Learning Landscapes. 2011; 4(2):17-23.
  • DAMASIO A. Descartes' error. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons; 1994.
  • DAMASIO A. The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Heinemann; 1999.
  • DARLING-HAMMOND L. The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher. 1996; 6:5-17.
  • DEWEY J. Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books; 1963.
  • DUNBAR R, SHULTZ S. Evolution in the social brain. Science. 2007; 317:1344-1347.
  • ECO U. It's not what you know. The Guardian. 2004; 3 April, 7.
  • GLASER BG, STRAUSS AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Nueva York: Aldine. 1967.
  • HOLLAND JL. Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. American Psychologist. 1996; 51(4):397-406.
  • HUBER GL. AQUAD Six. Manual for the Analysis of Qualitative data. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag; 2012.
  • HUBER GL. Aprendizajes activos y metodologías educativas. Revista de Educación, número extraordinario. 2008; 59-81.
  • JAWITZ J. Learning in the academic workplace: the harmonization of collective and the individual habitus. Studies in Higher Education. 2009; 34(6):601-614. doi:10.1080/03075070802556149
  • JOHNSON DW, JOHNSON RT. An educational psychology success story: interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher. 2009; 38(5):365-379.
  • KAHNEMAN D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Books; 2011.
  • KING M, MORISON I, REED G, STACHOW G. Student feedback systems in the business school: A departmental model. Quality Assurance in Education. 1999; 7(2):90-100.
  • KOCH C. How physics and neuroscience dictate your free will. Scientific American, April 12; 2012.
  • KOHLER E, KEYSERS C, UMILTÀ MA, FOGASSI L, GALLESE V, RIZZOLATTI G. Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science. 2002; 297:846-848.
  • KRUMBOLTZ JD, WORTHINGTON RL. The school to work transition from a learning theory perspective. The Career Development Quarterly. 1999; 47:312-325.
  • KRUMBOLTZ JD, MITCHELL AM, JONES GB. A social learning theory of career selection. The Counseling Psychologist. 1976; 6(1):71-81.
  • LADSON-BILLINGS G. New directions in multicultural education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory. In: J. A. Banks and C. A. M. Banks (Eds.). Hand-book of research on multicultural education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004. Pp. 50-65.
  • LAVE J, WENGER E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
  • LEHER J. Why we don't believe in science. The New Yorker, June 7; 2012.
  • LIEBERMAN A, POINTER-MACE DH. Teacher learning: the key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education. 2008; 59(3):226-234.
  • MARTÍNEZ MA, SAULEDA N. Interdependencia entre las concepciones sobre el aprendizaje y la mente en el escenario de las perspectivas colaborativas de la educación. In: E. Tonda and A. Mula (Eds.). Scripta in Memoriam. Alicante: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante; 2001. Pp. 235-254.
  • MARTÍNEZ MA, SAULEDA N, HUBER G. Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2001; 17:965-977.
  • MITCHELL WJT. What pictures want? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2005.
  • MILLIS B, COTTELL PG. Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. New York: ACE Oryx; 1998.
  • MIRSAFIAN H, MOHAMADINEJAD A. Sport volunteerism: a study on volunteering motivations in university students. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2012; 7(1)Proc:73-84.
  • PLUMTON C. An exploration of factors involved in choosing recreation as an academic major. Thesis Master of Arts. University of Manitoba. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(03), (AAT MR08939); 2005.
  • PUTNAN RT, BORKO H. What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher. 2000; 29:4-15.
  • RAYMORE LA, BERNO T. Undergraduate parks, recreation, and leisure education: Variables associated with recruitment and implications for retention. Schole: A journal of leisure studies and recreation education. 1996; 10:35-43.
  • RIFKIN J. The empathic civilization. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin; 2009.
  • RIZZOLATTI G, SINIGAGLIA C. Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions an emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  • ROSENFIELD I, ZIFF E. How the mind works: Revelations. The New York Review of Book. LV. 2008; 11:62-65.
  • ROTH WM. Authenctic school science. Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995.
  • ROTH WM. Designing Communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer A. P; 1998.
  • STIEGLER B. La formation de la nouvelle raison: Sept proposition pour l'ecole. In: D. Kambonahner, P. Meirien and B. Stiegler (Eds.). L'école, le numérique et la societé qui vient. Paris: Mille et une nuits; 2012.
  • SUPER DE. A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In: D. Brown, L. Brooks, and Associates (Eds.). Career choice and development (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1990. Pp. 89-97.
  • TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1991; 211:453-458.
  • WALKER M. Higher education pedagogies. Glasgow: McGraw Hill Education; 2006.
  • WHITCOMB J, BORKO H, LISTON D. Growing talent. Promising professional development models and practices. Journal of Teacher Education. 2009; 60(3):207-212.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet