Validez material y constitucionalismo garantista

  1. Ródenas Calatayud, Angeles
Revue:
Doxa: Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho

ISSN: 0214-8676 2386-4702

Année de publication: 2011

Número: 34

Pages: 265-274

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/DOXA2011.34.16 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

D'autres publications dans: Doxa: Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

The purpose of this article is to highlight an insurmountable contradiction in Ferrajoli’s positivist constitutionalism (constitucionalismo garantista). On the one hand, positivist constitutionalism is adamantly opposed to weighting, relying on simple subsumption and on the criterion of normative hierarchy for the resolution of conflicts of material validity; but, on the other hand, Ferrajoli’s conception requires a broad notion of normative validity, able to account for those normative conflicts in which several constitutional principles compete with each other when supporting the material validity of a certain norm.

Références bibliographiques

  • Ferrajoli, L.., Constitucionalismo principialista y constitucionalismo garantista,