Critical Legal Studies en pocas palabras

Referencias bibliográficas

• ALTMAN, Andrew (1990), Critical Legal Studies. A Liberal Critique, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jer-sey.
• BALKIN, Jack (1987), “Deconstructive Practice and Legal Th eory”: Yale Law Journal 96, 743-786.
• BERMAN, Nathaniel (1987), “Modernism, Nationalism, and the Rhetoric of Reconstruction”: Yale Journal of Law and Humanities, 1987351ss.
• BINDER, Guyora (1987), “On Critical Legal Studies as Guerrilla Warfare”: Georgetown Law Journal 76, 1-36.
• BOYLE, James (1985): “Th e Politics of Reason: Critical Legal Th eory and Local Social Th ought”: University of Penns-ylvania Law Review 133, 685-780.
• BOYLE, James (ed.) (1992), Critical Legal Studies, Dartmouth, Aldershot.
• CARRINO, Agostino (1992), “Solidaridad y Derecho. La sociología jurídica de los ‘Critical Legal Studies’”, Doxa, nº 12, 1992/2.
• CRENSHAW, Kimberle (1989), “Race, Reform and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscri-mination Law”, en Joerges, Christian, y Trubek, David M. (eds.) Critical Legal Th ought: An American-German Debate, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 1989, pp. 139ss.
• DALTON, Clare (1985), “An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine”: Yale Law Journal 94, 997-1114.
• FREEMAN, Alan (1987), “Legitimizing Racial Discrimination Th rough Antidiscrimination Law: A Critical review of Supreme Court Doctrine”: Minnesota Law Review 62, 1049ss.
• FRUG, Gerald (1984), “The Ideology of Bureaucracy in American Law”: Harvard Law Review 97, 1276ss.
• FRUG, Mary Joe (1992), Postmodern Legal Feminism, Routledge, New York.
• GABEL, Peter (1984), “The Phenomenology of Rigths-Consciousness and the Pact of the Withdrawn Selves”: Texas Law Review 62, 1563-1599.
• GORDON, Robert (1982), “New Developments in Legal Th eory”, en Kairys, David (ed.), Th e Politics of Law. A Progressive Critique, 2ª ed., Pantheon Books, New York, pp. 413-425.
• GORDON, Robert (1984), “Critical Legal Histories”: Stanford Law Review 36, 57-125.
• GORDON, Robert (1987), “Unfreezing Legal Reality: Critical Approaches to Law”: Florida State Law Review 15, 195ss.
• GORDON, Robert (1989), “Critical Legal Studies as a Teaching Method, Against the Background of the Intellectual Politics of Modern Legal Education in the United States”: Legal Education Review 1, 59-83.
• HARVARD Law Review Association (ed.) (1986), CLS. Essays on Critical Legal Studies Selected from the Pages of the Harvard Law Review, Cambridge, Mass.
• HORWITZ, Morton J. (1977), The Transformation of American Law, 1780-1860, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• HORWITZ, Morton J. (1992), The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960, Oxford University Press, New Yo r k .
• HUTCHINSON, Allan C. (ed.) (1989), Critical Legal Studies, Rowman and Littlefi eld, Totowa, New Jersey.
• JOERGES, Christian, y TRUBEK, David M. (eds.) (1989), Critical Legal Th ought: An American-German Debate, Nomos, Baden-Baden.
• KAIRYS, David (ed.) (1998), Th e Politics of Law. A Progressive Critique, 3ª ed., Basic Books, New York (1ª ed., Pantheon Books, New York, 1982).
• KELMAN, Mark (1984), “Trashing”: Stanford Law Review 36, 293-348.
• KELMAN, Mark (1987), A Guide to Critical Legal Studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (1976), “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication”: Harvard Law Review 89, 1685-1778.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (1979), “Th e Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries”: Buff alo Law Review 28, 205-382.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (1983), Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy, Afar, Cambridge, Mass.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (1986), “Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology”: Journal of Legal Education 36, 518-562.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (1988), “Radical Intellectuals in American Culture and Politics, or My Talk at the Gramsci Ins-titute”, Rethinking Marxism, Vol. 1, Nº 3.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (1991), “A Semiotics of Legal Argument”: Syracuse Law Review 42, 75-115.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (1992), “Nota sobre la historia de CLS en los Estados Unidos”: Doxa, nº 11, 1992/1, 283-293.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (1997), A Critique of Adjudication (fi n de siècle), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• KENNEDY, Duncan (2008), Legal Reasoning. Collected Essays, Th e Davies Group, Aurora, Colorado.
• KENNEDY, David (1985), “Spring Break”: Texas Law Review 63, 1377ss.KENNEDY, David (1986), “Critical Th eory, Structuralism and Contemporary Legal Scholarship”: New England Law Review 21, 209-289.
• KLARE, Karl (1978), “Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937-1941”: Minnesota Law Review 62, 265ss.
• KLARE, Karl (1979), “Law Making as Praxis”: Telos 40, 123ss.
• MINDA, Gary (1995), Postmodern Legal Movements. Law and Jurisprudence at Century’s End, New York University Press, New York.
• MINOW, Martha (1987), “Interpretring Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover”: Yale Law Journal 96, 1860ss.
• MINOW, Martha (1990), Making All the Diff erence. Inclusion, Exclusion and American Law, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
• OLSEN, Frances (1983), “The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform”: Harvard Law Review96, 1497ss.
• OLSEN, Frances (1984), “Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis”: Texas Law Review 63, 387-432.
• OLSEN, Frances (1990), “Feminism and Critical Legal Theory: An American Perspective”: International Journal of the Sociology of Law 18, 199ss.
• PELLER, Gary (1985), “The Metaphysics of American Law”: California Law Review 73, 1151ss.
• PELLER, Gary (1990), “Race Consciousness”: Duke Law Journal 1990, 201ss.
• PÉREZ LLEDÓ, Juan A. (1996), El movimiento “Critical Legal Studies”, Tecnos, Madrid.
• SCHLEGEL, John (1984), “Notes Toward an Intimate, Opinionated and Aff ectionate History of the Conference on Critical Legal Studies”: Stanford Law Review 36, 391ss.
• SINGER, Joseph (1982), “The Legal Rights Debate in Analytical Jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld”: Wisconsin Law Review 1982, 975ss.
• SINGER, Joseph, Stanford Law Review 1-2/36 (1984): Critical Legal Studies Symposium.
• TORRES, Gerald (1988), “Local Knowledge, Local Clor: Critical Legal Studies and the Law of Race Relations”: Uni-versity of San Diego Law Review 25, 1043ss.
• TRUBEK, David (1984), “Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism”: Stanford Law Review 36, 575ss.
• TRUBEK, David (1990), “Back to the Future: Th e Short, Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement”: Florida State University Law Review 18, 1-55.
• TUSHNET, Mark (1984), “An Essay on Rights”: Texas Law Review 62, 1363ss.
• TUSHNET, Mark (1988), Red, White and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• TUSHNET, Mark (1991), “Critical Legal Studies: A Political History”: Yale Law Journal 100, 1515-1544.
• UNGER, Roberto M. (1975), Knowledge and Politics, Th e Free Press, New York; v.e. Conocimiento y política, L. Rodrí-guez Ozán (trad.), Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1985.
• UNGER, Roberto M. (1976), Law in Modern Society. Toward a Criticism of Social Th eory, Th e Free Press, New York.
• UNGER, Roberto M. (1983), “The Critical Legal Studies Movement”: Harvard Law Review 96, 563-675.
• WEST, Robin (1988), “Jurisprudence and Gender”: University of Chicago Law Review 55, 1-72.