¿Cambian sus preferencias los participantes en la deliberación?

  1. Ganuza Fernández, Ernesto
  2. Francés García, Francisco José
  3. Lafuente Fernández, Regina
  4. Garrido, Fernando
Revista:
REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

ISSN: 0210-5233

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 139

Páginas: 111-132

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5477/CIS/REIS.139.111 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el cambio de opinión de los participantes en un foro deliberativo. Su contribución reside en estudiar hasta qué punto esos cambios perduran en el tiempo. Partiremos de la hipótesis de Mackie que sostiene que los cambios de opinión en un contexto deliberativo no pueden ser interpretados considerando variables de forma aislada, sino que deben basarse en la red actitudinal de los individuos de la que emergen sus preferencias. Los resultados nos muestran que algunos cambios no se mantienen tiempo después de la deliberación entre algunos individuos. El trabajo detalla la importancia que adquieren determinadas variables en el cambio de opinión a corto y a largo plazo, así como la interrelación que se da entre diferentes actitudes en tres momentos distintos antes y después de la deliberación.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andersen, Vibeke N. and Kasper Hansen (2007): How Deliberation Makes better Citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the Euro., European Journal of Political Research, 46: 531-556.
  • Barabas, Jason (2004): How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinion. The American Political Science Review, 98, 4: 687-701.
  • Besette, Joseph (1980): Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government, en R. Goldwin and W. Schambra (eds.), How Democratic is the Constitution, Washington: American Entreprise Institute.
  • Brikman, Dannete and David Peterson (2006): Public Opinion Reaction to Repeated Events. Political Behaviour, 28, 1: 87-112.
  • Chambers, Simone (2003): Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6: 307-326.
  • Chong, Dennis, Jack Citrin and Patricia Conley (2001): When Self-interest Matters., Political Psychology, 22, 3: 541-570.
  • Cuesta, Maria, Joan Font, Ernesto Ganuza, Braulio Gómez and Sara Pasadas (2008): Encuesta Deliberativa, Cuadernos Metodológicos 42, Madrid: CIS.
  • Della Porta, Donatella (2005): Deliberation in Movement: Why and How to Study Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements., Acta Politica, 40: 336-350.
  • Delli Carpini, Michael X., Fay L. Cook and Lawrence R. Jacobs (2004): Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review Political Science, 7: 315-344.
  • Druckman, James and Kjersten Nelson (2003): Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence., American Journal of Political Science, 47, 4: 729-745.
  • Dryzek, John and Christian List (2003): Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation British Journal of Political Science, 33: 1-28.
  • Feldman, Stanley (1988): Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 2: 416-440.
  • Fishkin, James (1997): The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Fishkin, James (2003): Consulting the Public through Deliberative Polling., Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22: 128-133.
  • Ganuza, Ernesto and Francisco Francés (2012): The Deliberative Turn in Participation., European Political Science Review (DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000270).
  • Grönland, Kimmo, Maija Setälä and Kaisa Herne (2010): Deliberation and Civic Virtue: Lessons from a Citizen Deliberation Experiment., European Political Science Review, 2, 1: 95-117.
  • Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson (2004): Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Hansen, Kasper M. (2004): Deliberative Democracy and Opinion Formation, Odense: University of Southern Denmark Press.
  • Huckfeldt, Robert, Jeannete M. Mendez and Tracy Osborn (2004): Disagreement, Ambivalente and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Hereogeneous Networks. Political Psychology, 25, 1.
  • Jöreskog Karl G. and Dag Sörbom (1989): Lisrel 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications, Chicago: SPSS.
  • Kline, Rex B. (1998): Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Nueva York: Guilford Press.
  • Kosnik, Lea-Rachel (2008): Refusing to Budge: A Confirmatory Bias in Decision Making?., Mind Society, 7: 193-214.
  • Landwehr, Claudia (2005): Rational Choice, Deliberative Democracy and Preference Transformation., Studies in Social and Political Thought, 11: 40-68.
  • Landwehr, Claudia, Katharina Holzinger (2010): Institutional Determinants of Deliberative Interaction., European Political Science Review, 2, 3: 373-400.
  • Mackie, Gerry (2006): Does Democratic Deliberation Change Minds?., Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 5 (3): 279-303.
  • Mackie, Gerry (2008): Deliberation, but Voting Too., Working Paper, University of California (en línea). http://dss.ucsd.edu/~gmackie/documents/DeliberationButVotingToo.pdf), ultimo acceso, 15 de enero de 2011.
  • Mattei, Franco and Richard Niemi (2005): Political Efficacy., en Sam Best and Bejamin Radcliffe (eds.), Pollin America: An Encyclopedia of Public Opinion, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Mendelberg, Tali (2002): The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence., en Delli Carpini, L. Hudy and R. Y. Shapiro (eds.), Research in Micropoliticis, volumen 6: Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation, Nueva York: Elsevier Press.
  • Morrel, Michael (2005): Deliberation, Democratic Decision-making and Internal Political Efficacy, Political Behavior, 27, 1: 49-69.
  • Moya, Carlos (1990): The Philosophy of Action, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Mutz, Diana (2006): Hearing the Other Side. Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nelson, Thomas E., Zoe M. Oxley and Rosalee A. Clawson (1997): Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects., Political Behavior, 19, 3: 221-246.
  • Petty, Richard E., Duane T. Wegener and Leandre R. Fabrigar (1997): Attitudes and Attitude Change., Annual Review of Psychology, 48: 609-647.
  • Petty, Richard E., Duane T. Wegener and Leandre R. Fabrigar, Zakary L. Tormala, Pablo Briñol and Jarvis W. Blair (2003): Implicit Ambivalence from Attitude Change: An Exploration of the PAST Model., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (1): 21-41.
  • Searle, John R. (2004): Mind: A Brief Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Steiner, Jurg, Andre Bächtiger, Markus Spörndli y Marco R. Steenbergen (2005): Deliberative Politics in Action, Cambridge: CUP.
  • Talpin, Julien (2011): Schools of Democracy, Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Thompson, Dennis (2008): Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science. Annual Review of Political Sciences, 11: 497-520.
  • Tormala Zakary L. and Richard E. Petty (2002): What Doesn't Kill me Makes me Stronger. The Effects of Resisting Persuasion about Persons: Some Determinats and Implications., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 1660-1672.
  • Wojcieszak, Magdalena, Young M. Back and Michael X. delli Carpini (2010): Deliberative and Participatory Democracy? Ideological Strength and the Processes Leading from Deliberation to Political Engagement. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 2: 154-180.
  • Zaller, John (1992): The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Nueva York: CUP.
  • Zaller, John and Stanley Feldman (1992): A Simple Theory of the Survey Respond: Answering Question versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36: 579-616.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet