Los programas institucionales de acción tutorialuna experiencia desarrollada en la universidad de Alicante

  1. Lapeña Pérez, Cristina
  2. Sauleda Parés, Narciso
  3. Martínez Ruiz, María Ángeles
Aldizkaria:
Revista de investigación educativa, RIE

ISSN: 0212-4068,  1989-9106

Argitalpen urtea: 2011

Alea: 29

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 341-362

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de investigación educativa, RIE

Laburpena

The University of Alicante has committed itself to the design and development of a tutorial relationship comparable to a collaborative space for learning personalisation where dialogue, communication and reflection prevail; an action based on the principles of network collaboration, commitment and reflection on practice. This approach shapes the framework for the present research, the prime objective of which was to analyse the degree of effectiveness of a Tutorial Action Programme implemented at the University of Alicante during the 2006/2007 academic year, taking as a reference the perceptions, opinions and assessments of tutors. The nature of the problem under study has guided the selection of a research design, the qualitative approach, having being chosen as the most favourable one in this case because it provides a descriptive answer to the problem. Furthermore, quantitative assessments will be drawn, which will allow us to quantify and infer categories. The results of this research study provide some positive evidence that suggest that tutorial action implemented at the University of Alicante is a collaboration space which encourages learning and thinking along with the personal growth of students throughout their years at university.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Allen, T. D. y Poteet, M. L. (1999). Developing effective mentoring relationships: Strategies from the mentor’s viewpoint. The Career Development Quarterly, 48, 59-73.
  • Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L. & Burroughs, S. M. (1997).The mentor’s perspective: A qualitative inquiry and agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 70-89.
  • Barab, S. y Roth, W. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 3-13.
  • Bhattacharjee, Y. (2007). Postdoctoral training: NSF, NHI emphasizes the importance of mentoring. Science, 317, 10-16.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-42.
  • Bruner, J. S. (2002). Actos de significado: más allá de la revolución cognitiva. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Chao, G. T., Walz, P. M. & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45, 619-636.
  • Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The Spreads of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370-379.
  • Cid, A. & Pérez, A. (2006). La tutoría en la Universidad de Vigo según la opinión de sus profesores. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 24 (2), 395-421.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). The flat earth and education: how America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36 (6), 318-334.
  • Day, C., Sammons, P. y Gu Q. (2008). Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies in research on teachers’ lives, work, and effectiveness: from integration to synergy. Educational Researcher, 37 (6), 330-342.
  • Del Rincón, B. (2005). Tutoría universitaria en la convergencia europea. Murcia: ICE.
  • Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38 (3), 181-199.
  • Ercikan, K. & Roth, W. M. (2006). What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative? Educational Researcher, 35 (5), 14-23.
  • Errante, A. (2000). But sometimes you’re not part of the story: oral histories and ways of remembering and telling. Educational Researcher, 29 (2), 16-27.
  • Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What’s worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Goleman, D. & Boyatzis, R. (2008). Social inteligente and the biology of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 86 (9), 74-81.
  • Goodlad, J. (1994). Educational renewal: better teachers, better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Goodlad, J. (1997). The public purpose of education and schooling. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gordon, E. & Gordon, H. (1990). Centuries of tutoring. A history of alternative education in American and Western Europe. Lanham: University Press.
  • Greeno, J. G. & Moore, J. L. (1993). Situativity and symbols: Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17, 49-61.
  • Haack, S. (2005). Trial and error: the supreme court’s philosophy of science. American Journal of Public Health, 95 (1), 66-73.
  • Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (1998). What’s worth fighting for out there. New York: Teachers college press.
  • Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium. Theory into practice, 39 (1), 50-56.
  • Holley, K. A. & Colyar, J. (2009) Rethinking texts: narrative and the construction of qualitative research. Educational researcher, 38 (9), 680-686.
  • Huber, G. & Gürter, L. (2003). AQUAD Seis para WINDOWS. Manual del Programa de análisis de datos cualitativos. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.
  • Hundt, I. M. & Kurzweil, J. (2007). Business office feature: Focus on diversity: Meaningful mentoring-Native American and Latino success history. Science, 318, 123-126.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lázaro Martínez, A. (1997a). La función tutorial en la formación docente. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 28, 93-108.
  • Lázaro Martínez, A. (1997b). La acción tutorial de la función docente universitaria. En P. Apocada y C. Lobato (Eds.), Calidad en la universidad: orientación y evaluación (pp. 71-101). Barcelona: Laertes.
  • Lee, C. D. (2009). Historical evolution of risk and equity: interdisciplinary issues and critiques. Review of research in education, 33, 63-100.
  • Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of rivacy: autonomy and iniciative in teachers professional relations. Teachers College, Record, 91 (4), 509-536.
  • Little, J. W. (1998). Organizing schools for teacher learning. En L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as a Leearning Professional. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 233-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pfund, C., Maidl Pribbenow, C., Branchaw J., Miller Lauffer S. & Handelsman J. (2006). The Merits of Training Mentors. Science, 311, 473-474.
  • Rodríguez Espinar, S. (2002). La orientación y la función tutorial, factores de la calidad de la educación. En CES (Ed.), Los educadores en la sociedad del siglo XXI, (pp. 89-160). Madrid: MEC – Consejo Escolar del Estado.
  • Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 169-174.
  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27 (2), 4-13.
  • Shelly, A. & Sibert, E. (1992). Qualitative Analysis: A Cyclical Process Assisted by Computer. En G. L. Huber (Ed.), Qualitative Analyse: Coputereinsatz in der Sozialoforschung (pp. 71-114). Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag.
  • Whitely, W., Dougherty, T. W. & Dreher, G. F. (1991). Relationship of career mentoring and socioeconomic origin to managers’ and professionals’ early career progress. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 331-351.
  • Zabalza, M. A. & Cid, A. (2006). La tutoría en la universidad desde el punto de vista del profesorado. Bordón, 58 (2), 247-267.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet