La píldora del día despuéssu conflictividad jurídica como manifestación de la objeción de conciencia farmacéutica

Abstract

The marketing in our Country of called 'pill of the day later', in all that that his(her,your) effect can be abortive, even if not necessarily it has to be, it has come to add to the manifestations of the known one as 'objection of pharmaceutical conscience'. Whereas the state legislation in the matter objetor does not contemplate expressly this institute, any autonomous laws yes that allude nominatively to the same one, though without making concrete its scope. The question was taken to the judicial area on the occasion of the regulation of the Meeting of Andalusia imposing the possession of a minimum of stock of this product in all the offices of drugstore.The result of this conflict, formed of the Judgment of the Supreme Court of April 23, 2005 and the Judgment of the Top Court of Justice of Andalusia of January 8, 2007, has been considered by a sector doctrinal like favorable to this type of objection. In the present work the question is analyzed, putting in fabric of reason that has reached judicially this recognition, at the time that one proposes the defense of this type of convictions across the direct exerciseof the right to the freedom of beliefs of the art. 16 of our Carta Magna.