¿Porqué preocuparnos por la pérdida de la biodiversidad?relaciones entre biodiversidad, servicios de los ecosistemas y bienestar humano

Referencias bibliográficas

• BALMFORD, A., et al. 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297: 950-953.
• CHAN, K.M.A.; PRINGLE, R.M.; RANGANATHAN, J.; BOGGS, C.L.; CHAN, Y.L.; EHRLICH, P.R.; HAFF, P.K.; HELLER, N.E.; AL-KHAFAJI, K.; y MACMYNOWSKI, D.P. (2007). When Agendas Collide: Human Welfare and Biological Conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 59-68.
• COSTANZA, R. y FOLKE, C. 1997. Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness, and sustainability as goals. Pages 49-68 in: G. C. Daily, editor. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
• LOREAU, M., et al. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804-808.
• LUDWIG, D. (2000). Limitations of economic valuation of ecosystems. Ecosystems 3: 31-35.
• MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT (2003). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
• MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT (2005). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
• NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. 2005. Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decision-making. Page 277. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
• OSTFELD, R. S., y LOGIUDICE, K. (2003). Community disassembly, biodiversity loss, and the erosion of an ecosystem service. Ecology 84:1421-1427.
• RICKETTS, T.H., DAILY, G.C., EHRLICH, P.R. y MICHENER, C.D. (2004). Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:12579-12582.
• SEKERCIOGLU, C.H.; DAILY, G.C., y EHRLICH, P.R. (2004). Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:18042-18047.