Persistencia del resultado contable y sus componentesimplicaciones de la medida de ajustes por devengo

  1. Íñiguez Sánchez, Raúl
  2. Poveda Fuentes, Francisco
Revista:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Año de publicación: 2008

Número: 137

Páginas: 33-61

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2008.10779638 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BASU, S. 1997. The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 3-38.
  • BRADSHAW, M.; RICHARDSON, S., y SLOAN, R. 2001. Do Analysts and Auditors Use Information in Accruals?, Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 45-74.
  • COLLINS, D., y HRIBAR, R. 2000. Earnings-based and Accrual-based Market Anomalies: One Effect or Two?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 101-123.
  • FAMA, E., y FRENCH, K. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on Stocks and Bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3-56.
  • FAMA, E. F., y MACBETH, J. D. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests, Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3), 607-636.
  • FRANCIS, J., y SMITH, M. 2005. A Reexamination of the Persistence of Accruals and Cash Flows, Journal of Accounting Research, 43, 413-450.
  • HUNO, M. 2000. Accounting standards and value relevance of financial statements: An international analysis, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30 (3), 420-431.
  • GARCÍA-LARA, J. M.; GARCÍA OSMA, B., y GILL DE ALBORNOZ, B. 2006. Effects of database choice on empirical accounting research, Abacus 42 (3-4), 426-454.
  • LAFOND, R. 2005. Is the Accrual Anomaly a Global Anomaly?, Working paper, 4555-05, MIT Sloan School of Management.
  • MASHRUWALA, C.; RAJGOPAL, S., y SHEVLIN, T. 2006. Why is the accrual anomaly not arbitraged away? The role of idiosyncratic risk and transaction costs, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42 (1-2), 3-33.
  • MISHKIN, F. 1983. A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconometrics: Testing. Policy Ineffectiveness and Efficient-Markets Models, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • PINCUS, M.; RAJGOPAL, S., y VENKATACHAIAM, M. 2005. The Accrual Anomaly: Internacional Evidence, Working Paper, University of Iowa, University of Washington y Duke University.
  • RICHARDSON, S.; SLOAN, R.; SOLIMÁN, M., y TUNA, I. 2005. Accrual Reliability, Earnings Persistence and Stock Prices, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (3), 437-485.
  • SLOAN, R. 1996. Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows about Future Earnings?, The Accounting Review, 71, 289-315 (Pubitemid 126174078)
  • TESTS, W., y WASLEY, C. 1996. Estimating Earnings Response Coefficients: Pooled versus Firm-specific Models, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21, 279-295.
  • XIE, H. 2001. The Misprieing of Abnormal Accruals, The Accounting Review, 76, 357-373.
  • ZACH, T. 2002. Inside the accrual anomaly, Working Paper, University of Rochester.
  • WATTS, R. L. 2003. Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and Implications, Accounting Horizons, (17), 207-221.
  • WHITE, H. 1980. Aheteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48, 817-838.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet