Complex learningthe role of knowledge, intelligence, motivation and learning strategies

Referencias bibliográficas

• Beier, M.E. & Ackerman, P.L. (2005). Age, ability and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge: promising results in a real-world learning environment. Psychology and Aging, 20(2), 341-355.
• Biggs, J.B. (1987). Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ). Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
• Carmines, E.G. & Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. London: Sage Publ.
• Castejón, J.L. (2001). Introducción a la psicología de la instrucción [Introduction to Instructional Psychology]. Alicante: Ediciones Club Universitario.
• Castejón, J.L. & Gilar, R. (2006). Factors involved in complex learning: A model of expert competence acquisition. In S.N. Hogan (ed.): New Developments in Learning Research (pp. 1-34). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
• Castejón, J.L. & Navas, L. (1992). Determinantes del rendimiento académico en la enseñanza secundaria. Un modelo causal [Determinants of academic achievement in Compulsory education. A Causal Model]. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 18(61), 697-730.
• Castejón, J.L., Prieto, M.D., Pérez, A.M., & Gilar, R. (2004). El rol del conocimiento y de las habilidades intelectuales generales en la adquisición del aprendizaje complejo [The role of knowledge and general intellectual abilities in complex learning acquisition]. Psicothema, 16(4), 600-605.
• Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavior sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
• Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
• De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10(3), 249-266.
• Ericsson, K.A. (1998). The scientific study of expert performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity. High Ability Studies, 9, 75-100.
• Ericsson, K.A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproductible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 329-361.
• Ericsson, K.A. (2005). Superior decision making as an integral quality of expert performance: Insights into the mediating mechanisms and their acquisition through deliberate practice. In R. Lipshitz & H. Montgomery (eds.): How professionals make decisions (pp. 135-167). Nahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
• Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
• Ericsson, K.A. & Lehmann, A.C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence on maximal adaptations on task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.
• Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture and Activity, 5(3), 178-186.
• Fleck, J. & Weisberg, R. (2004). The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem. Memory and Cognition, 32(6), 990-1006.
• Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking. The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93-104.
• Goldman, S.R., Petrosino, A.J., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1999). Design principles for instruction in content domains: Lessons from research on expertise and learning. In F.T. Durso, R.S. Nickerson, R.W. Schvaneveldt, S.T. Dumais, D.S. Lindsay & M.T.H. Chi (eds.): Handbook of Applied Cognition (pp. 595-627). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Jackson & Ward (2004). A fresh perspective on progress files: A way of representing complex learning and achievement in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4), 423-449.
• Hernández, F. (1996). Cuestionario de Procesos de Estudio [Study Process Questionnaire]. Murcia: Department of Methods of Investigation and Diagnostic in Education, University of Murcia, Spain.
• Kraiger, K., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1995). Measuring knowledge organization as a method for assesssing learning during training. Human Factors, 37, 804-816.
• Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Minnaert, A. & Janssen, P.J. (1996). How general are the effects of domain-specific prior knowledge on study expertise as compared to general thinking skills? In M. Birenbaum & F. Dochy (eds.): Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 265-282). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Núñez, J.C., Solano, P., González-Pienda, J.A., & Rosario, P. (2006). Self-regulation processes measurement through self-report methodology. Psicothema, 18(3), 353-358.
• Pelechano, V. (1973). Manual del cuestionario MAE [Manual of MAE Questionnaire]. Madrid: Fraser.
• Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks. Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
• Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1999). PCKNOT 4.3 User’s manual. Mesa, AZ: Interlink Inc.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1991). Theory-based testing of intellectual abilities: Rationale for the triarchic abilities test. In H.A. Rowe (ed.): Intelligence: reconceptualization and measurement (pp. 183-202). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1993). Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Level H). Not published Test Manual.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1994). Cognitive conceptions of expertise. International Journal of Expert Systems, 7(1), 1-12.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 127-140.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1999,a). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 359-375.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1999,b). Ability and expertise. It’s time to replace the current model of intelligence. American Educator, Spring, 10-13 & 50-51.
• Sternberg, R.J. (2003). Construct validity of the theory of special intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. Lubart (eds.): Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 55-77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Sternberg, R.J., Castejón, J.L., Prieto, M.D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Multiple Choice Items) in Three International Samples: An empirical test of the Triarchic Theory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 1-16.
• Sternberg, R.J., Prieto, M.D., & Castejón, J.L. (2000). Análisis factorial confirmatorio del Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (nivel H) en una muestra española: resultados preliminares [Confirmatory factorial analysis of Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (level H) in a Spanish sample: preliminary results]. Psicothema, 12(4), 642-647.
• Thompson, R. & Zamboanga, B. (2004).Academic aptitude and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in introduction to Psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 778-784.
• Valle, A., Cabanach, R.G., Rodríguez, S., Núñez, J.C., & González-Pienda, J.A. (2006). Academia goals, cognitive and self-regulatory strategies. Psicothema, 18(2), 165-170.
• Van de Wiel, M.W.J., Boshuizen, H.P.A., & Schmidt, H.G. (2000). Knowledge restructuring in expertise development: Evidence from pathophysiological representations of clinical cases by students and physicians. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 323-355.
• Veeman, M., Elshout, J.J., & Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 187-209.
• Veenman, M. & Beishuizen, J. (2004). Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying text under conditions of text difficulty and time constraint. Learning and Instruction, 14(6), 621-640.