Análisis factorial confirmatorio del sternberg triarchic abilities test (nivel-h) en una muestra española: resultados preliminares

  1. Prieto Sánchez, María Dolores
  2. Castejón Costa, Juan Luis
  3. Sternberg, Robert J.
Zeitschrift:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Datum der Publikation: 2000

Ausgabe: 12

Nummer: 4

Seiten: 642-647

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Psicothema

Zusammenfassung

En el presente trabajo se comparan distintos modelos teóricos acerca de la estructura subyacente del STAT (Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test), nivel H, utilizando las técnicas de Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio. La comparación de los distintos modelos se realiza mediante el empleo de una estrategia de análisis jerárquico factorial confirmatorio y de comparación de modelos anidados, bajo diferentes asunciones, relativas a un concepto unidimensional de la inteligencia, un concepto factorial tradicional y un modelo triárquico. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto que el modelo que logra un mejor ajuste a los datos empíricos es el basado en una concepción triárquica de la inteligencia. Estos resultados se discuten atendiendo a la validez conceptual de la teoría triárquica.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Bentler, P. (1989). Comparative fit índices. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1993). EQS. Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
  • Bentler, P.M., & Dudgeon (1996). Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, and directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 563-592.
  • Bermejo, M.R., Castejón, J.L., & Sternberg, R.J. (1996). Insight in children with high intelligence level. FAISCA, 4, 85-94.
  • Burt, C. (1940). The factors of the mind. Londres: University of London Press.
  • Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analityc studies. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Christiansen, N.D; Lovejoy, M.C; Szymanski, J., & Lang, A. (1996). Evaluating the structural validity of measures of hierarchical models: An illustrative example using the social problem-solving inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(4), 600-625.
  • Dunn, G., Everitt, B., & Picles, A. (1993). Modelling covariances and la tent variables using EQS. Londres: Chapman & Hall.
  • García, J.A. (1997). Estrategias de aprendizaje en alumnos de altas habilidades. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Facultad de Educación. Universidad de Murcia.
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiples intelligences. Nueva York: Basic.
  • Gardner, H. (1999). Are there additional intelligences? The case for naturalist, spiritual, and existential intelligences. En J. Kane (Ed.), Education, information, and transformation (pp. 111-131). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Gustafsson, J.E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179-203.
  • Horn, J.L. (1994). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. En R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The encyclopedia of human intelligence (Vol. 1) (pp. 443-451). Nueva York: Macmillan.
  • Jensen, A.R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
  • Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51-67.
  • Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. Nueva York: Macmillan.
  • Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173- 180.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond IQ. A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. Nueva York: Viking.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1991). Theory-based testing of intellectual abilities: rationale for the triarchic abilities test. En H.A. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence: reconceptualization and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1993). Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Level H). Manual del test no publicado.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1994a). Experimental approaches to human intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 153-161.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1994b). Changing conceptions of intelligence and their impact upon the concept of giftedness: The triarchic theory of intelligence. En J.L. Genshaft, M. Bireley, & C.L. Hollinger (Eds.), Serving gifted and talented students (pp. 33-47). Austin, TX: Proed.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1996). The triarchic theory of intelligence. En D.P. Flanagan, J.L. Genshaft, & P.L. Harrison (Eds.), Beyond traditional intellectual assessment: Contemporary and emerging theories, test, and issues (pp. 92-104). Nueva York: Guilford Press.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Successful intelligence. Nueva York: Plume. Sternberg, R.J., Castejón, J.L., & Bermejo, M.R. (1997). Factores intelectuales en la cognición creativa definida por el insight. Boletín de Psicología, 57, 41-58.
  • Sternberg, R.J., Castejón, J.L., Prieto, M.D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. (en prensa). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Multiple-Choice Items) in Three International Samples: An empirical test of the Triarchic Theory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, (en prensa).
  • Sternberg, R.J., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1995). A triarchic view of identifying, teaching, and assessing gifted children. Roeper Review, 17 (4), 255- 260.
  • Sternberg, R.J., Forsythe, G.B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J., Snook, S., Williams, W.M., Wagner, R.K., & Grigorenko, E. (en prensa). Practical intelligence. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). Triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 1-11.
  • Tomás, J.M. y Olive r, A. (1998). Efectos de formato de respuesta y método en análisis factorial confirmatorio. Psicothema, 10(1), 197- 208 .
  • Vernon, P.E. (1971). The structure of human abilities. Londres: Methuen. Wheaton, B. (1988). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. En J.S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: Avoing error in quantitative research (pp. 193-225). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Worth, D.A., & Herry, Y. (1996). The french self-perception profile for children: score validity and reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56 (4), 678-700.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet