Retos y dificultades para la implantación de la adopción abierta en España.El papel de la mediación

  1. Rosser Limiñana, Ana 1
  2. Berástegui Pedro-viejo, Ana 2
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

  2. 2 Universidad Pontificia Comillas
    info

    Universidad Pontificia Comillas

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/017mdc710

Zeitschrift:
Mediaciones sociales

ISSN: 1989-0494

Datum der Publikation: 2017

Nummer: 16

Seiten: 175-191

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5209/MESO.58115 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Mediaciones sociales

Zusammenfassung

The latest changes made in the Spanish legislation on protection of children and adolescents incorporate the figure of open adoption. This is an innovative measure because it clashes with the obligation to break the link between the child and his biological family contemplated until then in the adoption and allows the adoptee to maintain relationship with his family of origin through views or communications. Although open adoption has a long tradition in other countries, its implementation in Spain raises important questions. The objective of this work is the study of expert opinions on the conditions for its implementation in Spain through the analysis of the thematic content of the interviews carried out. This analysis highlight the challenges and difficulties of its implementation, as well as the importance of mediation as a strategy for promoting contacts.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Andréu, J. (2002). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada. Fundación Centro Estudios Andaluces, Universidad de Granada, 10(2), p. 1-34.
  • Avery, R.J. (1998). Information Disclosure and Openness in Adoption: State Policy and Empirical Evidence. Children and Youth Services Review, 20 ( l/2), 57-85.
  • Berástegui, A. (2016). La adopción abierta: de las creencias y los datos. en R. Arce, B. G. Amado, M. Vilariño, IX Congreso Internacional de Psicología Jurídica y Forense. Libro de Actas, págs. 148-150, Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense, Santiago de Compostela (La Coruña).
  • Berry, M. (1993) Adoptive parents' perceptions of, and comfort with, open adoption. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice and Program, 72(3), pp. 231-253.
  • Brodzinsky, D.M., Schechter, M. y Marantz Henig, R. (2011). Soy adoptado. La vivencia de la adopción a lo largo de la vida (Nueva edición revisada y actualizada). Madrid: Grupo 5.
  • Brown, D., Ryan, S., y Pushkal, J.T. (2007). Initial validation of the Open Adoption Scale: Measuring the influence of adoption myths on attitudes toward open adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 10(3-4), 179-196.
  • Consejo General del Poder Judicial (2014). Informe al Anteproyecto de Ley de Protección a la Infancia. Disponible en: http://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Poder-Judicial/Consejo-General-del-Poder-Judicial/Actividad-del-CGPJ/Informes/Informe-al-Anteproyecto-de-Ley-de-Proteccion-a-la-Infancia
  • Crea, T. M. y Barth, R. P. (2009). Patterns and predictors of adoption openness and contact: 14 years postadoption. Family Relations, 58(5), 607-620.
  • Faulkner, M., y Madden, E.E. (2012). Open adoption and post-adoption birth family contact: A comparison of non-relative foster and private adoptions. Adoption Quarterly, 15(1), 35-56.
  • Grotevant, H.D. y Mcroy, R.G. (1998). Openness in Adoption: Exploring Family Connections. California: Sage Publications, pp. 2-6.
  • Grotevant, H.D., Wrobel, G.M., Von Korff, L., Skinner, B., Newell, J., Friese, S. y Mcroy, R.G. (2008). Adoption Quaterly, 10(3 & 4), 79-101.
  • Grotevant, H.D., Mcroy, R.G., Wrobel, G.M. y Ayers-López, S. (2013). Contact Between Adoptive and Birth Families: Perspectives from the Minnesota Texas Adoption Research Project. Child Developement Perspectives, 7(3), 193–198.
  • Haas, B. (2015). Treinta años de experiencia en la adopción abierta: Ventajas, obstáculos y conocimientos profesionales expertos. Boletín SSI/CIR, 194, 6-7.
  • Katz, J.M. (2015). La mediación en la fase preadoptiva: Una amplia variedad de beneficios para todas las partes, considerando la adopción abierta. Boletín SSI/CIR, 194, 8-9.
  • Kedward, C., Luckock, B. y Lawson, H. (1999). Mediation and post-adoption contact: the early experience of the Post-Adoption Centre Contact Mediation Service. Adoption & Fostering Journal, 23(3), 16-26.
  • Di Lisi, S. (2015). Holden Lori with Hass Crystal: The open-hearted way to opten adoption. Helping your child growing up whole. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24 (5), 1519-1522.
  • Ledesma, J. (2013). La mediación familiar en la búsqueda de orígenes. Revista Digital Mundo Mediación, 3. Disponible en: http://www.mundomediacion.es/revista-11-edicion-8/3-vivir-la-mediacion/27-la-mediacion-familiar-en-la-busqueda-de-origenes
  • Ley 26/2015 de protección a la infancia y la adolescencia. BOE n 180, de 29 de julio de 2015. Disponible en: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2015-8470
  • Logan, J. (2010). Preparation and planning for face-to-face contact after adoption: the experience of adoptive parents in a UK study. Child &family social work, 15(3), 315-324.
  • Maynard, J. (2005). Permanency mediation: a path to open adoption for children in out-of-home care. Child welfare, 84(4), 507-526.
  • Mcroy, R. G., Grotevant, H. D., Ayers-Lopez, S. y Henney, S. (2007). Open adoptions: Longitudinal outcomes for the adoption triad. Handbook of adoption: Implications for researchers, practitioners, and families, 175-189.
  • Ryan, S.D., Harris, G., Brown, D., Houston, D.M., Smith, S.L. y Howard, J.A. (2011). Open adoptions in child welfare: Social worker and foster/adoptive parent attitudes. Journal of public child welfare, 5(4), 445-446.
  • Siegel, D. H. (2012). Growing up in open adoption: Young adults’ perspectives. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 93, 133–140.
  • Siegel, D. H. (2013). Open adoption: Adoptive parents' reactions two decades later. Social work, 58(1), 43-52.
  • SSI/CIR (2015). La adopción abierta: Varias velocidades, varias medidas. Centro Internacional de referencia para los derechos del niño privado de la familia, 194. Disponible en www.iss-ssi.org
  • Sullivan, R. y Lathrop, E. (2004). Openness in adoption: retrospective lessons and prospective choices. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 393–411.
  • Vázquez Sito, F. (1994). Análisis de contenido categorial: el análisis temático. Barcelona: Unitat de Psicologia Social –Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  • Von Korff, L., Grotevant, H. D., y Mcroy, R.G. (2006). Openness arrangements and psychological adjustment in adolescent adoptees. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3), 531.
  • Wolfgram, S. M. (2008). Openness in adoption: What we know so far—A critical review of the literature. Social Work, 53, 133–142.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet