Questionnaire to Measure the Participation of Nursing Professionals in Mentoring Students

  1. Águeda Cervera Gasch
  2. Loreto Maciá Soler
  3. Blanca Torres Manrique
  4. Desirée Mena Tudela
  5. Pablo Salas Medina
  6. María Isabel Orts Cortés
  7. Víctor Manuel González Chordá
Revista:
Investigación y educación en enfermería

ISSN: 0120-5307,  2216-0280

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 35

Número: 2

Páginas: 182-190

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17533/UDEA.IEE.V35N2A07 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Investigación y educación en enfermería

Resumen

Objetivo. Validar un cuestionario para medir el nivel de participación de los profesionales de enfermería clínicos en la tutela de estudiantes de enfermería durante las prácticas clínicas. Métodos. Diseño y validación de un cuestionario. Se determinaron las propiedades psicométricas de la herramienta mediante cuatro fases: 1- revisión de la literatura; 2- evaluación de la validez de contenido; 3- prueba piloto, pretest cognitivo y estudio de la fiabilidad intraobservador; 4-, estudio de validez de constructo mediante un análisis factorial exploratorio de componentes principales con rotación varimax en una muestra de 249 profesionales de enfermería de atención primaria y de atención hospitalaria de diferentes provincias españolas. La consistencia interna se estudió con el coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados. La validez de contenido global fue superior a 0.8. La versión final del cuestionario fue de 33 ítems, con un CCI global de 0.852 y un alfa de Cronbach de 0.837. El análisis factorial explicó el 55.4% de varianza total, con una solución de cinco factores que formaron las dimensiones Implicación, Motivación, Satisfacción, Obstáculos y Compromiso. Conclusión. El cuestionario evaluado tiene validez y fiabilidad adecuadas que permite determinar el nivel de participación de las enfermeras en la tutela de estudiantes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • (1) Maciá-Soler ML, González Chordá VM, Salas Medina P, Mena Tudela D, Cervera Gasch Á, Orts Cortés MI. Level of involvement of clinical nurses in the evaluation of competence of nursing students. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2014; 32(3):461-70.
  • (2) Chen Y, Watson R, Hilton A. A review of mentorship measurement tools. Nurse Educ. Today. 2016; 40:20-8.
  • (3) Dobrowolska B, McGonagle I, Kane R, Jackson CS, Kegl B, Bergin M, et al. Patterns of clinical mentorship in undergraduate nurse education: A comparative case analysis of eleven EU and non-EU countries. Nurse Educ. Today. 2016; 36:44-52.
  • (4) Skela-Savič B, Kiger A. Self-assessment of clinical nurse mentors as dimensions of professional development and the capability of developing ethical values at nursing students: A correlational research study. Nurse Educ. Today. 2015; 35(10):1044-51.
  • (5) Webb C, Shakespeare P. Judgements about mentoring relationships in nurse education. Nurse Educ. Today. 2008; 28(5):563-71.
  • (6) Jokelainen M, Turunen H, Tossavainen K, Jamookeeah D, Coco K. A systematic review of mentoring nursing students in clinical placements. J. Clin. Nurs. 2011; 20(19-20):2854-67.
  • (7) Moseley LG, Davies M. What do mentors find difficult? J. Clin. Nurs. 2008; 17(12):1627-34.
  • (8) Perry RN. Role modeling excellence in clinical nursing practice. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2009; 9(1):36-44.
  • (9) Jokelainen M, Jamookeeah D, Tossavainen K, Turunen H. Finnish and British mentors’ conceptions of facilitating nursing students’ placement learning and professional development. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2013; 13(1):61-7.
  • (10) Edo-Gual M, Tomás-Sábado J, Bardallo-Porras D, Monforte-Royo C. The impact of death and dying on nursing students: an explanatory model. J. Clin. Nurs. 2014; 23(23-24):3501-12.
  • (11) Darlow B, Coleman K, McKinlay E, Donovan S, Beckingsale L, Gray B, et al. The positive impact of interprofessional education: a controlled trial to evaluate a programme for health professional students. BMC Med. Educ. 2015; 15:98.
  • (12) Heaslip V, Scammell JM. Failing underperforming students: the role of grading in practice assessment. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2012; 12(2):95-100.
  • (13) Wilkes Z. The student-mentor relationship: a review of the literature. Nurs. Stand. 2006 May 24-30; 20(37):42-7.
  • (14) Ownby K, Schumann R, Dune L, Kohne D. A comparison of a traditional clinical experience to a precepted clinical experience for baccalaureateseeking nursing students in their second semester. Nurs. Res. Pract. 2012; 2012:276506.
  • (15) Broadbent M, Moxham L, Sander T, Walker S, Dwyer T. Supporting bachelor of nursing students within the clinical environment: perspectives of preceptors. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2014; 14(4):403-9.
  • (16) Wink D, Ruland JP. Multiagency Online Preceptor Education: Design, Implementation, and Outcomes. Nurse Educ. 2016; 41(5):270-3.
  • (17) Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res. Nurs. Health. 2007; 30(4):459–67.
  • (18) Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13, on the Protection of Personal Data núm. 298, de 14 December 1999. Spain. Available from https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-1999-23750
  • (19) Johnson KV. Improving Adjunct Nursing Instructors’ Knowledge of Student Assessment in Clinical Courses. Nurse Educ. 2016; 41(2):108-10.
  • (20) Ruzafa-Martinez M, Lopez-Iborra L, MorenoCasbas T, Madrigal-Torres M. Development and validation of the competence in evidence based practice questionnaire (EBP-COQ) among nursing students. BMC Med. Educ. 2013; 13:19.
  • (21) Bray L, Nettleton P. Assessor or mentor? Role confusion in professional education. Nurse Educ. Today. 2007; 27(8):848–55.
  • (22) Vizcaya-Moreno MF, Pérez-Cañaveras RM, De Juan J, Saarikoski M. Development and psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T): the Spanish version. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2015; 52(1):361-7.
  • (23) Watson PB, Seaton P, Sims D, Jamieson I, Mountier J, Whittle R, et al. Exploratory factor analysis of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale (CLES+T). J. Nurs. Meas. 2014; 22(1):164-80.
  • (24) Chow SK, Wong LT, Chan YK, Chung TY. The impact and importance of clinical learning experience in supporting nursing students in endof-life care: cluster analysis. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2014; 14(5):532-7.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet