El contexto sociofamiliar y su incidencia en el rendimiento lector del estudiante en PISA

  1. Esteban Vázquez Cano 1
  2. Ana María de la Calle Cabrera 2
  3. Carlos Hervás-Gómez 3
  4. Eloy López Meneses 4
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidad Loyola Andalucía
    info

    Universidad Loyola Andalucía

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0075gfd51

  3. 3 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  4. 4 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Aldizkaria:
Ocnos: revista de estudios sobre lectura

ISSN: 2254-9099 1885-446X

Argitalpen urtea: 2020

Zenbakien izenburua: Prácticas literarias digitales: leer, escribir y conversar de literatura en línea

Alea: 19

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 43-54

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.18239/OCNOS_2020.19.1.2122 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Ocnos: revista de estudios sobre lectura

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

Esta investigación pretende analizar la influencia del nivel educativo de los padres y madres, la profesión y el rol educativo de los mismos en el rendimiento lector de sus hijos e hijas de forma comparada entre países de lengua iglesa y española. El estudio se aborda desde un análisis multinivel y de regresión logística binaria. Los resultados muestran que el contexto sociofamiliar aporta una predicción entorno al 20% en países de habla española y el 15% en países de habla inglesa. La incidencia más significativa se produce por el nivel de estudios medio de los padres y la muestra de interés de los padres en las actividades escolares y el apoyo educativo hacia sus hijos en ambos bloques de países

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Anderson, C. A., & Huesmann, R. (2003). Human aggression: A social-cognitive view. En M. A. Hogg, & J. Cooper, Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 296-323). Londres, Reino Unido: Sage Publications.
  • Aram, D., & Levin, I. (2002). Mother-child joint writing and storybook reading: Relations with literacy among low SES kindergartners. Merill-Palmer Quarterly, 48, 202-224. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2002.0005
  • Bjorklund, A., & Salvanes, K. G. (2010). Education and Family Background: Mechanisms and Policies. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5002. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1620398
  • Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Wiley.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. En J. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
  • Bradley, R., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
  • Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of Opportunity in Comparative Perspective: Recent Research on Educational Attainment and Social Mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122232
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. En T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 1643-1647). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Elsevier.
  • Coleman, B., & McNeese, M. N. (2009). From home to school: The relationship among parental involvement, student motivation, and academic achievement. The International Journal of Learning, 16(7), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i07/46457
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  • De-Broucker, P., & Underwood, K. (1998). Intergenerational education mobility: An international comparison with a focus on postsecondary education. Education Quarterly Review, 5(2), 30-45.
  • Domina, T. (2005). Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 78, 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070507800303
  • Drolet, M. (2005). Participation in post-secondary education in Canada: Has the role of parental income and education changed over the 1990s. Ottawa, Canadá: Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series.
  • Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., & Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic background and achievement. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Seminar Press.
  • Eccles, J. S., Vida, M. N., & Barber, B. (2004). The relation of early adolescents’ college plans and both academic ability and task-value beliefs to subsequent college enrollment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431603260919
  • Edgerton, J., Peter, T., & Roberts, L. W. (2008). Back to the Basics: Socio-Economic, Gender, and Regional Disparities in Canada’s Educational System. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(4), 861-888.
  • Epstein, J. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Colorado, Estados Unidos: Corwin.
  • Fan, X. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A growth modeling analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(1), 27-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970109599497
  • Farver, J. A. M., Xu, Y., Eppe, S., & Lonigan, C. (2006). Home environments and young Latino children’s school readiness. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.04.008
  • Freeman, R. B., & Viarengo, M. (2014). School and Family Effects on Educational Outcomes Across Countries. Economic Policy, 29(79), 395-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12033
  • Harkness, S., Super, C., Barry, O., Zeitlin, M., & Jennipher, L. (2009). Assessing the environment of children's learning: The developmental niche in Africa. En E. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducation assessment (pp.133- 155). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Springer.
  • Hong, S., & Ho, H. Z. (2005). Direct and indirect longitudinal effects of parental involvement on student achievement: Second-order latent growth modeling across ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.32
  • Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Urban Secondary School Student Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906293818
  • Kirby, J. R., & Hogan, B. (2008). Family literacy environment and early literacy development. Exceptionality Education International, 18, 112-130.
  • Knighton, T., & Mirza, S. (2002). Postsecondary participation: The effects of parents’ education and household income. Education Quarterly Review, 8(3), 25-32.
  • Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32(5/6), 567-606. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004951.04408.b0
  • McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.185
  • Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (2015). Preguntas Frecuentes sobre PISA 2015. https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/inee/dam/jcr:62bcf02f-ead1-4e13-a074-79827215aaeb/pisa2015-faq-finalesp.pdf
  • Ngorosho, D. (2011). Reading and writing ability in relation to home environment: A study in primary education in rural Tanzania. Child Indicators Research, 4, 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9089-8
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do–Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). París, Francia: OCDE Publishing.
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (2016). PISA 2015 Resultados clave. París, Francia: OCDE Publishing.
  • O'Connell, M. (2019). Is the impact of SES on educational performance overestimated? Evidence from the PISA survey. Intelligence, 75, 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.04.005
  • Patall, E. A., Cooper, H. R., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039-1101. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325185
  • Plomin, R. (1997). Behavioral genetics. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Freeman.
  • Reese, L., & Gallimore, R. (2000). Immigrant Latinos’ cultural model of literacy development. American Journal of Education, 108, 103-134. https://doi.org/10.1086/444236
  • Sancho, C., Jornet, J. M., & Perales, M. J. (2014). Valor social subjetivo de la educación: docencia y resultados escolares. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 7(2), 197-207.
  • Sayans-Jiménez, P., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Bernal-Bravo, C. (2018). Influence of family wealth on student reading performance in PISA. Revista de Educación, 380, 129-155.
  • Schoon, I., & Parsons, S. (2002). Competence in the face of adversity: the influence of early family environment and long-term consequences. Children and Society, 16, 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.713
  • Sobolewski, J. M., & Amato, P. R. (2005). Economic Hardship in the Family of Origin and Children's Psychological Well-Being in Adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00011.x
  • Solano-Flores, G., & Milbourn, T. (2016). Capacidad evaluativa, validez cultural, y validez consecuencial en PISA. RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 22(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8281
  • Vázquez-Cano, E. (2013). Análisis y evaluación de la didáctica con base en la lectura digital en el marco PISA: El caso de España. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación educativa, 6(3), 61-76.
  • Vázquez-Cano, E. (2017). Analysis of Difficulties of Spanish Teachers to Improve Students’ Digital Reading Competence. A Case Study within the PISA Framework. Pedagogika, 125(1), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2017.13
  • Vázquez-Cano, E., Sirignano, F., & López Meneses, E. (2014). Incidencia de las variables no controlables directamente por el sistema educativo en el rendimiento del alumnado en competencia lectora en PISA: Análisis comparativo España-Finlandia. Avances en Supervisión Educativa, 20, 1-12.
  • Whitson, S. C., & Keller, B. K. (2004). The influences of family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 32(4), 493-568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000004265660