Equality of opportunity with categorical data

  1. Herrero, Carmen 1
  2. Villar, Antonio 2
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

  2. 2 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Zeitschrift:
Lecturas de Economía

ISSN: 0120-2596,  2323-0622

Datum der Publikation: 2014

Nummer: 81

Seiten: 9-30

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.17533/UDEA.LE.N81A1 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Lecturas de Economía

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

This paper refers to some social evaluation problems when equity matters. We propose here a way of assessing the equality of opportunity that is applicable to categorical data. It consists of dividing society into groups with similar characteristics and to measure the dispersion of outcomes within those groups, from the distribution of the population in the different categories. An empirical illustration on the equality of opportunity in education is provided, using the PISA 2012 data on mathematical knowledge regarding the Spanish regions.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Abul-Naga, Ramses & Yalcin, Tarik (2008). “Inequality measurement for ordered response health data”, Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 1614-1625.
  • Allison, R. Andrew & Foster, James (2004). “Measuring Health Inequality Using Qualitative Data”, Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 23, Issue 3, pp. 505-524.
  • Arneson, Richard (1989). “Equality and equal opportunity for welfare”, Philosophical Studies, Vol. 56, pp. 159–194.
  • Almas, Ingvild; Cappelen, Alexander; Lind, Jo Thori; Sorensen, Erik & Tungodden, Bertil (2011). “Measuring unfair (in)equality”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 95, Issue 7-8, pp. 488-499.
  • Bleichrodt, Han & van Doorslaer, Eddy (2006). “A welfare economics foundation for health inequality measurement”, Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 25, Issue 5, pp. 945-957.
  • Bossert, Walter (1995). “Redistribution mechanisms based on individual characteristics”, Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 29, pp. 1–17.
  • Bossert, Walter & Fleurbaey, Marc (1996). “Redistribution and compensation”, Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 343–355.
  • Bourguignon, François; Ferreira, Francisco H. & Menéndez, Marta (2007). “Inequality of opportunity in Brazil”, Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 53, Issue 4, pp. 585–618.
  • Calo-Blanco, Aitor & García-Pérez, J. Ignacio (2012). “On the welfare loss caused by inequality of opportunity”, The Journal of Economic Inequality, DOI 10.1007/s10888-013-9247-6.
  • Checchi, Daniele; Peragine, Vito (2010). “Inequality of opportunity in Italy”, Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 429-450.
  • Cohen, G.A. (1989). “On the currency of egalitarian justice”, Ethics, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 906–944.
  • Fleurbaey, Marc (1995). “Equality and responsibility”, European Economic Review, Vol. 39, Issue 3-4, pp. 683–689.
  • Fleurbaey, Marc (2008). Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Goerlich, Francisco & Villar, Antonio (2009). Desigualdad y Bienestar Social: de la Teoría a la Práctica. España: Fundación BBVA.
  • Herrero, Carmen & Villar, Antonio (2013). “On the Comparison of Group Performance with Categorical Data”, PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 12.
  • Herrero, Carmen; Méndez, Ildefonso & Villar, Antonio (2014). “Analysis of Group Performance with Categorical Data when Agents are Heterogeneous: The Evaluation of Scholastic Performance in the OECD through PISA”, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 40, pp. 140-151.
  • Lefranc, Arnaud; Pistolesi, Nicolas & Trannoy, Alain (2008). “Inequality of opportunities vs. inequality of outcomes: Are western societies all alike?”, Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 54, pp. 513-546.
  • Lefranc, Arnaud; Pistolesi, Nicolas & Trannoy, Alain (2009). “Equality of opportunity and luck: definitions and testable conditions, with anapplication to income in France”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 93, Issue 11-12, pp. 1189-1207.
  • OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming Social Background (vol. II). París: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through Equity (vol. II). París: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (vol. I). París: OECD Publishing.
  • Roemer, John. E. (1996). Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Roemer, John E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ruiz-Castillo, Javiel. (2003). “The Measurement of Inequality of Opportunities”, Research in Economic Inequality, Vol. 9, pp. 1-34.
  • Stiglitz, Joseph; Sen, Amartya & Fitoussi, Jean Paul (2009). “Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress”. Retrieved from: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm
  • United Nations (2010). Human Development Report. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. New York: United Nations Developtment Programme.
  • Villar, Antonio (2005). “On the Welfare Evaluation of Income and Opportunity”, Contributions to Theoretical Economics, Vol. 5, Issue 1.
  • Zheng, Buhong (2011). “A new approach to measure socioeconomic inequality in health”, Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 9, Issue 4, pp. 555-577.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet