From work one’s ass off to bite one’s face offUnderstanding the degree of idiomaticity through syntactic and semantic inheritance in a network of (originally) resultative constructions
- 1 Department of English Studies, University of Alicante (UA)
ISSN: 2386-3935
Year of publication: 2024
Issue: 32
Type: Article
More publications in: Complutense Journal of English Studies
Abstract
This study is aimed at exploring the degree of idiomaticity of resultatives characterized by the structure [[V]i[pd]j[N]koff] through a qualitative examination of [V], [N], and the property of telicity. Based on a random extraction of 1,000 concordances from the English Corpus enTenTen21, findings show that the network of constructions is made up of three Types (‘Intensification’, ‘Astoundment’, and ‘Detachment’) and ten Subtypes, with ‘body part’ being the most frequent [N]. Also, the (sub)schemas in the network originate from the inheritance of at least one of the following properties: verbal intensification, (a part of) someone as recipient of an action, and detachment of such a part.
Bibliographic References
- Bolinger, Dwight. 1976. “Meaning and memory”. Forum Linguisticum,1: 1-14.
- Boas, Hans. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Sandford Monographs in Linguistics.
- Booij, Geert. 2010a. “Compound construction: Schemas or analogy? A Construction Morphology perspective”. In Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, edited by Sergio Scalise and Irene Vogel, 93–108. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.09boo
- Booij, Geert. 2010b. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0010
- Cappelle, Bert. 2008. “What should stockings look like? On the storage of linguistic information”. In Du fait grammatical au fait cognitif / From Gram to Mind: Grammar as Cognition, [Selected papers from the international conference “From Gram to Mind: grammar as cognition”, Bordeaux, France, 19-21 May 2005.], edited by J.-R. Lapaire, G. Désagulier and J.-B. Guignard. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110366273.251
- Cappelle, Bert. 2014. “Conventional combinations in pockets of productivity: English resultatives and Dutch ditransitives expressing excess”. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, edited by Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman and Gijsbert Rutten, 251-282). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110366273.251
- COD23 = Collins English Dictionary, 23rd ed. Harper Collins Publishers. Available at https://www.collinsdictionary.com/es/
- Corver, Norbert, Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck, William Harwood, Marko Hladnik, Sterre Leufkens and Tanja Temmerman. 2019. “Introduction: The compositionality and syntactic flexibility of verbal idioms”. Linguistics, 57(4): 725-733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0021
- Dehé, Nicole. 2002. Particle verbs in English. Syntax, information structure and intonation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.59
- Diessel, Holger. 2023. The Constructicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
- Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain me this: creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc772nn
- Goldberg, Adele E., and Ray Jackendoff. 2004. “The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions”. Language, 80(3): 532-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129
- Glasbey, Sheila R. 2003. “‘Let’s paint the town red for a few hours’: Composition of aspect in idioms”. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop: The Lexicon and Figurative Language, edited by A.M. Wellington, 42–48. Sapporo, Japan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/1118975.1118981
- Espinal, M. Teresa and Jaume Mateu. 2019. “Idioms and Phraseology”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics: n.p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.51
- Fernando, C. (1996). Idioms and Idiomaticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fillmore, C. J., Kay, K., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538.
- Fillmore, C. J. (2006). Articulating lexicon and constructicon. Presentation at the Fourth International Conference on Construction Grammar. Tokyo, Japan.
- Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R. & Rhodes, R. (2012). The FrameNet constructicon. In I. A. Sag & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar. CSLI, Stanford, CA.
- Flach, S. (2021). Beyond modal idioms and modal harmony: a corpus-based analysis of gradient idiomaticity in mod adv collocations. English Language and Linguistics, 25(4): 743-765.
- GDS = Green, Jonathon. (n.d.) Green’s Dictionary of Slang. Available at https://greensdictofslang.com/
- Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent Grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language. Mahwah/New Jersey /London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hu, X. (2020). Functional items, lexical information, and telicity: A parameter hierarchy-based approach to the telicity parameter. In A. Bárány, T. Biberauer, J. Douglas & S. Vikner (eds.), Syntactic architecture and its consequences I: Syntax inside the grammar, 329–355. Berlin: Language Science Press.
- Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kay P. (2002). English subjectless tagged sentences. Language, 78, 453–481.
- Kay, P., & Michaelis, L. A. (2019). A Few Words to do with Multiword Expressions. In C. Condoravdi and T. Holloway King (eds.), Tokens of Meaning: Papers in Honor of Lauri Karttunen (pp. 87-118). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
- Langacker, R. (1988). A usage-based construction. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Liontas, J. I. (2015). Straight from the horse's mouth: Idiomaticity revisited. In R. R. Heredia & A. B. Cieślicka (eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 301–340). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201–225.
- Mateu, J. & Espinal, M. T. (2007). Argument structure and compositionality in idiomatic constructions. The Linguistic Review, 24(1), 33-59.
- Mattiello, E. (2016). Analogical neologisms in English. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 28(2),103-142.
- McGinnis, M. (2005). Painting the wall red for a few hours: A reply to Glasbey 2003. Snippets, 10. Available at: http://www.ledonline/snippets
- MED2 = Macmillan English Dictionary, 2nd ed. Macmillan Education Limited. Available at https://www.macmillandictionary.com/
- Merchant, D. (2022). What’s in the bucket? Aspectual (non)compositionality in phrasal idioms. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 40(4), 1117–1158.
- MWD11 = Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary Online, 11th ed. Merriam-Webster Incorporated. Available at https://www.merriam-webster.com.
- Nunberg, G., Sag, I., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491–538.
- OED3 = Oxford English Dictionary Online, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. Available at http://www.oed.com.
- Rodríguez-Puente, P. (2012). The development of non-compositional meanings in phrasal verbs: A corpus-based study. English Studies 93(1), 71-90.
- Wechsler, S. (2010). Resultatives Under the ‘Event-Argument Homomorphism’ Construction of Telicity. In N. Erteschik-Shir, & T. Rapoport (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics.
- Wulff, S. (2008). Rethinking Idiomaticity: A Usage-based Approach (Research in Corpus and Discourse Series). London/New York: Continuum.