La evolución en una serie temporal de libros de texto (1945-2016)Cambios en la metodología y en la presencia de concepciones alternativas

  1. Pastor Pastor, Alejandro 1
  2. Limiñana Morcillo, Rubén 2
  1. 1 CIPFP Batoi
  2. 2 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Journal:
Ápice: revista de educación científica

ISSN: 2531-016X

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 3

Issue: 2

Pages: 71-92

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17979/AREC.2019.3.2.4811 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Ápice: revista de educación científica

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

We analyzed the topic of evolution in a set of biology textbooks from 1945 to 2016. The objectives of this study were to evaluate changes in the presence of misconceptions, as well as to analyze how contents about evolutions are presented. Additionally, we analyze tendencies on these aspects related to Spanish educational legislation. Results showed an increase in the treatment of history on the evolutionary thought, number of activities and number of figures, which might be related to changes in the teaching methodology. However, misconceptions remain in textbooks and there are few attempts to produce confrontation with them. Thus, it seems that the possibility of generating a significant conceptual change is low, since the necessary condition of “dissatisfaction with the current conceptualization” is not met.

Bibliographic References

  • Acevedo, J. A. y García-Carmona, A (2016). Rosalind Franklin y la Estructura Molecular del ADN: Un caso de historia de la ciencia para aprender sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia. Revista Científica, 25(2), 162-175.
  • Álvarez-Pérez, E. y Ruiz-Gutiérrez, R. (2016). Proposal for Teaching Evolutionary Biology: A bridge between research and educational practice. Journal of Biological Education, 50(2), 123-146. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1007887
  • Andrews, T. M., Price, R.M., Mead, L. S., McElhinny, T. L., Thanukos, A., Perez, K. E., Herreid, C. F., Terry, D. R. y Lemons, P. P. (2012). Biology undergraduates’ misconceptions about genetic drift. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 248-259. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-12-0107
  • Balgopal, M. M. (2014). Learning and intending to teach evolution: concerns of pre-service biology teachers. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 27-52. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9371-0
  • Bishop, B. A. y Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503
  • Butler, J., Mooney, G. y O’Grady, A. (2015). An investigation into the prevalence of ecological misconceptions in upper secondary students and implications for pre-service teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 300-319. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.943394
  • Catley, K. M. y Novick, L. R. (2009). Digging deep: Exploring college students' knowledge of macroevolutionary time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 311-332. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20273
  • Crowther, G. J. y Price R. M. (2014). Re: Misconceptions are “so yesterday!”. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 3-5. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-11-0226
  • Dole, J. A. y Sinatra G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational psychologist, 33(2-3), 109-128. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294
  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125-129.
  • Futuyma, D. J. (2015). Can modern evolutionary theory explain macroevolution? En E. Serrelli, N. Gontier (Eds.), Macroevolution explanation, interpretation and evidence, pp. 29-85. Cham, Suiza. Springer International Publishing.
  • Gibson, D. J. (1996). Textbook misconceptions: The climax concept of succession. The American Biology Teacher, 58(3), 135-140. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4450101
  • Gould, S. J. (1980). The evolutionary biology of constraint. Daedalus, 109, 39-52.
  • González-Galli, L. y Meinardi E. (2017). Obstáculos para el aprendizaje del modelo de evolución por selección natural en estudiantes universitarios de biología. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(2), 435-449.
  • Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156-175. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1
  • Hernández, M. C., Álvarez-Pérez, E. y Ruiz-Gutiérrez, R. (2009). La selección natural: aprendizaje de un paradigma. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 2, 107-121.
  • Hey, J. (1999). The neutralist, the fly and the selectionist. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(1), 35-38. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01497-9
  • Hiatt, A., Davis, G. K., Trujillo, C., Terry, M., French, D. P., Price, R. M. y Perez, K. E. (2013). Getting to evo-devo: concepts and challenges for students learning evolutionary developmental biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 494-508. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-11-0203
  • Ibáñez, M. T. y Martínez-Aznar, M. M. (2005). Solving problems in genetics (II): Conceptual restructuring. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1495-1519. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690500186584
  • Jablonka, E. y Lamb, M. J. (2010). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Evolution: The extended synthesis, 137-174. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/9780262513678.003.0007
  • Jeffery, K. R. y Roach. L. E. (1994). A study of the presence of evolutionary protoconcepts in pre‐high school textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 507-518. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310506
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: a look at textbooks and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 519-535. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310507
  • King, C. J. H. (2010). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 565-601. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690902721681
  • Linhart, Y. B. (1997). The teaching of evolution—we need to do better. BioScience, 47(6), 385-391. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1313153
  • Linnenbrink, E. A. y Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313-327.
  • Martínez Bonafé J. (2002). Políticas del libro escolar. Madrid. Ediciones Morata.
  • Martínez Losada, C. y García Barros, S. (2003). Las actividades de primaria y ESO incluidas en libros escolares. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 21(2), 243-264.
  • Maskiewicz A. C., Lineback J. E. (2013) Misconceptions are “so yesterday!”. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 352-356. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-01-0014
  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press.
  • Müller, G. B. (2007). Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(12), 943-949. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2219
  • Munson, B. H. (1994). Ecological misconceptions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 25(4), 30-34.
  • National Research Council. NRC (1996) National science education standards. National Academy of Sciences.
  • Nehm, R. H. y Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors' knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263-272. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1641/B570311
  • Occelli, M. y Valeiras, N. (2013). Los libros de texto de ciencias como objeto de investigación: una revisión bibliográfica. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 31(2), 133-152. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/ec/v31n2.761
  • Pardo Santano, P. (2004). ¿Qué actividades proponen los libros de texto elaborados para enseñar Geología? Pulso, 27, 49-60.
  • Perales, F. J. y Jiménez, J. D. (2002). Las ilustraciones en la enseñanza-aprendizaje de las ciencias. Análisis de libros de texto. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 20(3), 369-386.
  • Pigliucci, M. y Finkelman, L. (2014). The extended (evolutionary) synthesis debate: where science meets philosophy. BioScience, 64(6), 511-516. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x
  • Pintó, R., Aliberas i Maymí, J. y Gómez Carrillo, R. (1996). Tres enfoques de la investigación sobre concepciones alternativas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 14(2), 221-232.
  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. y Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211-227. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
  • Rees, P. A. A. (2007). The evolution of textbook misconceptions about Darwin. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), 53-55. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656062
  • San Román, S. (2013). Evolución de los modelos metodológicos y su relación con la política educativa en España. Educação e Pesquisa, 39(1). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022013000100015
  • Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 170-194. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001
  • Smith III, J. P., Disessa, A. A. y Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
  • Solbes, J. (2009). Dificultades de aprendizaje y cambio conceptual, procedimental y axiológico (I): Resumen del camino avanzado. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 6(1), 2-20.
  • Stern, L. (2004). Effective assessment: Probing students' understanding of natural selection. Journal of Biological Education, 39(1), 12-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655948
  • Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 259-266.
  • Tshuma, T. y Sanders, M. (2015). Textbooks as a possible influence on unscientific ideas about evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 49(4), 354-369. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.967274
  • Van Den Broek, P. y Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: the role of co‐activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 335-351. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1418
  • Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 205-221. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0140528790010209
  • Woodward, A., Elliott, D. L. (1987). Evolution and creationism in high school textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 49(3), 164-170. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4448468
Data source: Dialnet