¿Los modelos atómicos de Thomson y Rutherford que se presentan habitualmente en las clases se corresponden con sus aportaciones?

  1. Domènech-Blanco, Josep Lluís
  2. Martínez Torregrosa, Joaquín
  3. Savall Alemany, Francisco
Journal:
Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

ISSN: 0212-4521,  2174-6486

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 31

Issue: 1

Pages: 29-44

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Los modelos de Thomson y Rutherford constituyen el punto de partida del estudio de la estructura atómica de todos los cursos de Química. En este trabajo mostramos que la presentación que se suele hacer en la enseñanza de dichos modelos está bastante alejada de las aportaciones realizadas en su momento por Thomson y Rutherford.

Bibliographic References

  • Bensaude, B. y Stengers, I. (1997). Historia de la química. Madrid: Addison-Wesley.
  • Blanco, R. y Niaz, M. (1998). Baroque tower and gothic base: A lakatosian reconstruction of students' and teachers' understanding of structure of the atom. Science and Education, 7, pp. 327-360.
  • Cuellar, L., Gallego, R. y Pérez, R. (2008). El modelo atómico de E. Rutherford. Del saber científico al conocimiento escolar. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 26(1), pp. 43-52.
  • Geiger, H. y Marsden, E. (1909). On a diffuse reflection of the α-particles. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 82, pp. 495-500.
  • Geiger, H. y Marsden, E. (1913). The laws of deflexión of α particles through large angles. Phylosophical Magzine, serie 6, vol. 25, núm. 148, pp. 604-623.
  • Heilbron, J.L. (1981). Rutherford-Bohr atom. American Journal of Physics, vol. 49 (3), pp. 223-231.
  • Heilbron, J.L. y Kuhn, T.S. (1969). «The genesis of the Bohr atom» en Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences. Vol. 1, pp. 211-290. Nueva York: Arno Press.
  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp. 645-670. (Pubitemid 37496924)
  • Izquierdo, M. y Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2009). Physical construction of the chemical atom: Is it convenient to go all the way back? Science and Education, 18, pp. 443-455.
  • Justi, R. (2006). La enseñnza de las ciencias basada en la elaboración de modelos. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 24(2), pp. 173-184.
  • Justi, R. y Gilbert, J. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: some challenges in the case of 'the atom'. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), pp. 993-1009.
  • Kragh, H. (2010). Before Bohr: Teories of atomic structure 1850-1910. RePoSS: Research Publications on Science Studies 10. Århus: Department of Science Studies, University of Aarhus. URL: 〈http://www.ivs.au.dk/ reposs〉.
  • McKagan, S.B., Perkins, K.K. y Wieman, C.E. (2008). Why we should teach the Bohr and how to teach it effectively. Physical Review Special Topics: PER, 4, 010103. URL: 〈http://www.prst-per.asp.org/pdf/PRSTPER/v4/i1/ e010103〉.
  • Niaz, M. (1998). From Cathode Rays to Alpha Particles to Quantum of Action: A Rational Reconstruction of Structure of the Atom and Its Implications for Chemistry Textbooks. Science Education, 82, pp. 527-552.
  • Niaz, M., Aguilera, D., Maza, A. y Liendo, G. (2002). Arguments, contradictions, resistances, and conceptual change in students' understanding of atomic structure. Science Education, 86, pp. 505-525. (Pubitemid 37230317)
  • Rodríguez, M.A. y Niaz, M. (2002). How in spite of the rhetoric, history of chemistry has been ignored in presenting atomic structure in textbooks. Science and Education, 11, pp. 423-441.
  • Rodríguez, M.A. y Niaz, M. (2004). A reconstruction of structure of the atom and Its implications for general physics textbooks: A history and philosophy of science perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13 (3), september.
  • Rutherford, E. (1911). The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Philosophical Magazine, serie 6, vol. 21, pp. 669-688.
  • Rutherford, E. (1914). The structure of the atom. Philosophical Magazine, serie 6, vol. 27, pp. 488-498.
  • Sánchez Ron, J.M. (2001). Historia de la física cuántica. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.
  • Scerri, E.R. (2007). The periodic table: its story and its significance. Oxford: University Press.
  • Thomson, J.J. (1899). On the mases of the ions in gases at low pressures. Philosophical Magazine, 46, pp. 528-545.
  • Thomson, J.J. (1904a). Electricity and Matter. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Thomson, J.J. (1904b). XXIV. On the structure of the atom: an investigation of the stability and periods of oscillation of a number of corpuscles arranged at equal intervals around the circumference of a circle; with application of the results to the theory of atomic structure. Philosophical Magazine, serie 6, 7 (39), pp. 237-265. URL: 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 14786440409463107〉.
  • Thomson, J.J. (1906). LXX. On the number of the corpuscles in an atom. Philosophical Magazine, serie 11, pp. 769-781. URL: 〈http://www.chemteam. info/Chem-History/Thomson-1906/Thomson-1906.html〉.
Data source: Dialnet